What is the Broken Windows Theory in Criminology?

The Broken Windows Theory has been an important concept in criminology for decades, but it continues to stir debate about its effectiveness in policing and crime prevention.

In this blog, we’ll explore the theory, break down its key concepts, and explain how something as simple as a broken window can signal much larger issues within a community, potentially leading to more serious criminal behaviour.

Jump to:

The Broken Windows Theory in criminology was first introduced by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling in 1982. The theory proposes that visible signs of disorder signal that a neighbourhood is poorly maintained and not cared for. This, in turn, can encourage further disorderly behaviour, which can escalate into more serious crimes.

For example, imagine you walk through a neighbourhood and see that buildings have cracked windows, litter is scattered on the streets, and there’s graffiti on the walls. According to the theory, this kind of environment can make people think it’s okay to break the law, because it gives the impression that nobody is watching or cares.

The main concept of the broken window hypothesis is the idea that minor offences like vandalism, fare dodging, and public drunkenness are early signs of a breakdown in order and social control. When these small issues are ignored or not addressed, they can lead to larger problems, such as burglary, assault, or even more violent crimes.

The term broken windows syndrome refers to the idea that these small signs of decay, like broken windows or damaged property, signal that a place is vulnerable. Criminals may see this as an opportunity to commit more serious offences because it seems like the authorities aren’t paying attention.

In contrast, keeping a neighbourhood clean and orderly, repairing broken windows, removing graffiti, and keeping the streets free from litter, can help prevent the spiral into more significant crime.

One of the most well-known applications of the Broken Windows Theory is broken window policing. The theory is based on the idea that when small crimes are addressed, it sends a message that lawlessness will not be tolerated. This can, in turn, help create a safer and more orderly environment. The theory suggests that if police officers focus on tackling these minor offences, it will reduce the overall crime rate in the long run.

To better understand the broken windows theory, let’s look at some real-life situations where this concept has been applied.

One of the most famous examples of the broken window theory is the approach taken by New York City during the 1990s. Under the leadership of Mayor Giuliani and Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, the city took a hard stance on even minor crimes, such as graffiti, fare evasion, and turnstile jumping. Police officers would stop and arrest people for these small infractions, with the idea that it would prevent more serious crimes from occurring. The results were mixed; crime rates did fall, but there were also criticisms about the policing methods and accusations of racial profiling.

A more recent example of the broken window theory in criminology can be seen in the London Underground’s efforts to reduce crime. The British transport system introduced measures to reduce fare evasion and improve the general cleanliness of the stations. By cleaning up areas with broken glass, graffiti, and litter, they created a safer and more pleasant environment for commuters, ultimately helping to reduce minor offences and improve public safety.

While the broken windows theory suggests that addressing minor offences can help prevent more serious crimes, it has faced significant criticism over the years. Many argue that the theory oversimplifies the relationship between disorder and crime and that focusing too heavily on minor infractions can lead to over-policing and disproportionately impact certain communities.

Critics say that the theory can be ineffective and even harmful, as it may alienate communities and lead to unfair targeting of certain people or groups.

On the other hand, proponents of the theory point out that the broken window policy can make a real difference in certain areas by creating an atmosphere of order and safety. They believe that by maintaining public spaces and addressing minor crimes, society sends a clear message that disorder will not be tolerated.

While the broken window policing approach has had some success, it’s not the only strategy for crime prevention. Alternatives focus more on community engagement and social services. For instance, some cities have explored programs that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, mental health issues, and substance abuse. These programmes aim to help people rather than simply punish them, and they often seek to prevent crimes from happening in the first place.

Community policing is another alternative that encourages police officers to engage with local residents, building relationships and trust. This can help prevent crime by making people feel more secure and involved in the safety of their community.

While the Broken Windows Theory has been most commonly applied to urban areas, its principles can be relevant to any community where disorder or neglect may encourage crime. It can apply to suburban and rural areas as well, especially when looking at how the environment can influence crime rates.

Some scholars and critics argue that the Broken Windows Theory is debunked because its application can sometimes have negative effects, such as worsening tensions between police and communities. Studies have shown that the approach may not always reduce crime rates and could even exacerbate social problems. However, the debate over its validity continues in criminological circles.

Modern policing strategies still reference the Broken Windows Theory, particularly in cities looking to reduce crime through preventative measures. While some have moved away from strict "zero tolerance" approaches, elements of the theory, such as focusing on maintaining order and addressing minor crimes, remain part of community policing efforts.

While the Broken Windows Theory has been widely implemented in places like the United States and the United Kingdom, its applicability can vary by country and culture. The effectiveness of the theory depends on the specific social, economic, and political context of each area. Some countries have adapted the theory to suit their local policing needs, while others may focus on alternative crime prevention methods.

The social disorganisation theory suggests that communities with weak social ties and limited resources tend to experience higher crime rates. This theory aligns with the Broken Windows Theory, which argues that visible signs of disorder signal a lack of social cohesion. Both theories emphasise the importance of community involvement and a well-maintained environment in preventing crime.

The Broken Windows Theory can be applied to online spaces; signs of neglect or disorder on the internet, such as harassment, hate speech, or spamming, can encourage more harmful behaviour. By addressing these smaller issues early, online communities can prevent larger problems like cyberbullying, online fraud, or more severe forms of disruption.

If you’re interested in learning more about criminology and the theories that influence how crime is understood and managed, consider taking the Criminology Diploma Course with Centre of Excellence. This course offers in-depth insights into criminological theories, criminal behaviour, and law enforcement techniques. And the best part? You can sign up now and get the course for a special discounted price of just £29!